Look Dad - No Mouse! - CP Flight PRO MCP & EFIS Installed

/

cp flight pro mcp

In an earlier Journal entry, I mentioned that the CP Flight main control panel (MCP) PRO version I had purchased last September (before I embarked on the B737 Project) appeared to be faulty.  For some reason the MCP would not register on the USB port of the computer.  After many hours of wasted time, I returned the unit to Italy for either repair or replacement.

Just before Easter I received a replacement unit.  Paolo from CP Flight had decided to replace the electronics. 

Installation & Configuration

Installation of the CPF software and configuration of this new unit worked first time without any problem whatsoever.  Configuring the MCP to operate with Sim Avionics was straightforward and required some basic changes to the Server.exe configuration files.  I also had to clone the TCP_Client.exe and MCP.exe folders and copy these to the main server computer that has FSX and the MCP installed.  These folders and files need to be installed on the same computer as the MCP software and hardware is installed to allow Sim Avionics to recognise the device.

Simulator Start-Up Procedure

So what happens now is that I start FSX on the main server computer, then once FSX is running and the flight is open, I activate the MCP.exe shortcut which turns on the CP Flight MCP.  The process of the MCP.exe been turned on triggers the TCP_Client.exe to open and search for it’s counterpart on the network.  Turning on the Sim-A Server.exe (via a batch start file located on the client computer) allows the programs to communicate and the appropriate software to open on the flight deck.

cp flight pro mcp backlighting

Backlighting – An Initial Mystery

To connect the CP Flight backlighting was a mystery until SIM-A support informed me that you can either select a check box within the SIM-A server display window which causes the backlighting to be permanently on, or create a FSUIPC offset to a switch using the aircraft’s storm lights for manual activation.  I choose the later and have the backlighting set to a toggle on a GoFlight module.  This will suffice as I do not as yet have an overhead installed.

My Opinion of the Unit

The CP Flight MCP and EFIS unit has been discussed many times in various reviews and on U-Tube; the consensus being that the majority of users are very happy with the product.

The unit is well made, is aesthetically pleasing, and works as it should.  The backlighting is very good and the green buttons that indicate whether a function is turned on or off are very visible.  The unit is quite light in weight compared with other MCPs on the market, so it must be installed solidly into the MIP to minimise movement when pushing buttons, etc.  The solenoid operated A/T switch is a nice change to the normal flick type switch and the use of replica DZUS fasteners is a nice touch.

CP Flight support is also beyond reproach.  Paolo is helpful, courteous, and attempts to find solutions when a problem is evident.  I had an issue with my first MCP and Paolo spent considerable time with me working through issues attempting to find a solution.  CP Flight is not a “buy and forget” you type of company.

cp flight mcp pro

Major Advantage

One of the major advantages in using products from CP Flight is the very easy connectivity with other CP Flight modules.  The CP Flight family of modules are connected together by a daisy chain system.  A 5 pin (5 pole) DIN cable connects each module to each other with the main power being supplied by the MCP and its external 6 Volt power pack.  Connection to the computer is via a single USB cable.  What this makes for is a very simple, clean and modular way of installation.  There are no cards to connect or to find homes for -  nor any messy wiring.

Caveat

The only caveat is that the size of the MCP and EFIS are not an exact 1:1 ratio to the OEM 737 MCP and EFIS.  The CP Flight instrument is slightly narrower that the OEM counterpart.  Whilst this is not a major issue, it does pose a slight problem if you are using an OEM MIP, or a MIP that is sized correctly to the real part. 

If you are using a MIP made by FDS, an additional bracket assembly is required, and even then there is a slight gap between the MIP and MCP unit.

This brings me to an interesting point.  Not all MIPS are the same size nor are they all an accurate 1:1 ratio.  CP Flight is used  exclusively with the MIP produced by Fly Engravity, so it stands to reason that the Fly Engravity MIP will fit the CP Flight products accurately.  if you are using another brand MIP, then it is best to check before hand to ensure that the CP Flight avionics will fit correctly.

Nice to Fly without a Mouse….

Whatever the difference in size, It’s very pleasing to be able to fly without a mouse and have something to fill the gaping hole in the MIP.  I’ve solved the issue of the spacing difference by cutting some thin acrylic to the appropriate size and painting it Boeing grey.  Once fitted, you barely notice the slight gap.  Sometimes you have to compromise...

Although this post is not a review, if pressed to give a rating it would be 8.5/10

Now that the MCP and Captain EFIS is fitted and working, I need to order an additional EFIS unit for the Flight Officer side. 

Next on the agenda will be to populate the avionics for the center pedestal. 

Update

on 2015-09-23 13:03 by FLAPS 2 APPROACH

The CP Flight connection issues that were occurring have been rectified by a software update from CP Flight. With connectivity reassured, I have ordered additional CP Flight panels (two ADF navigation radio panels and a rudder trim module).

First Officer EFIS

The second EFIS has arrived and has been installed into the simulator.  The ease of installation of CP Flight modules should not be taken lightly; they are literally plug and fly.  To install the second EFIS unit involved me connecting a 5 pin DIN cable from the Captain side EFIS to the FO EFIS unit.  I also had to move the small slider pin on the rear of the unit to reflect either captain or first officer.

I wish all panels were this easy to install.

Wings & Arcade Games

/

qantas embroided pilot wings

Real-world pilots, whether military or civilian based, earn their wings.  Wings are a symbol of the time, study, work and effort that an individual has gone through to receive their pilot rating.  

In the military, receiving your wings represents more than just training.  For many, it’s the inclusion of being part of group of similar-minded individuals and allegiance to a particular squadron or unit with its inherent history. 

For example pilots joining 19 Squadron in the Royal Airforce become part of the history of the squadron which began operations during the First World War and included during the Second World War, pilots who flew in the Battle of Britain.  QANTAS pilots become part of the history of the airline, which began in the Northern Territory and is one of the oldest airlines still flying today with its original name. 

So where am I going with this?  Most of us are NOT real-world pilots, although many “simmers” may have a flying rating of some type.  To fly (correctly) a fully functional simulator still requires in-depth knowledge, time, study and effort on behalf of the person building and flying the simulator.  All too often, the task of learning to fly the “right way” is lost with Flight Simulator. 

Many people enjoy using slight simulator; jumping into whatever aircraft they choose and flying over terrain that otherwise they may not have the opportunity to view.  There is nothing wrong with this.  But, to truly engage flight simulator and see what it can offer, you have to stop and step back from the actual playing, and enter a world similar to that of a real-world pilot: study, work, effort, and an expenditure of time to learn the basics of airmanship and grasp the technical aspects of flying whatever aircraft you have chosen to simulate.  Learning the theory, at least initially, far outweighs the actual time spent flying in the simulator.

In some respects, simulation flying is more frustrating than real flying, as finding the appropriate study material is not easy.  There is only a limit to what books can teach you, especially when you are learning a high end aircraft such as the Boeing 737.  At some stage, you will need the guidance of a real-world pilot to instruct you in the correct method to apply the techniques learned.  

So, the next time someone suggests to you that you are just playing an arcade game, remind them of the time, study, work and effort that you’ve expended to be at whatever skill level you’re currently at. 

Wings, no matter if they are real or virtual, are earned (if only in the time spent reading) and are not given away!

737-300 Telephone & Microphone for 737-300 Center Pedestal

/

737-300 internal communications

I have installed to the rear of the center pedestal the correct telephone and microphone for the 737-300 aircraft.  Neither item is necessary, but it adds to aesthetics and fills the empty gap where the telephone should have been installed.  Although the telephone and microphone are functional, they have not been configured to operate with the avionics suite or flight simulator.

The center pedestal and telephone are not from a 737-800 aircraft, nor would they ever be seen on a Next Generation aircraft; they fill a gap until the respective OEM components can be found.

Sometimes it’s a matter of what is available, or waiting until a part becomes available. In this case, I decided to use what was available.

This type of telephone and microphone (as well as other types depending upon manufacture) were used on the 737-300 through to the 737-500 aircraft.

As you can see from the photograph, this telephone has been there and done that!  The telephone is considerably scratched, but I prefer using part that shows service, rather than using a shinny new reproduction item.

Main Instrument Panel (MIP) by Flight Deck Solutions - Review

/
 
 

Overview

The main instrument panel (MIP) is arguably one of the most important pieces of equipment in a flight deck; it is around the MIP that everything revolves.  Every enthusiast wants the MIP to be athletically pleasing and as real to the OEM product as possible.  Depending upon the end use, the MIP may act as a skeleton from which to add OEM parts, or standalone accommodating reproduction parts.

There are several companies that produce MIPS and each has its nuances.  After extensive research, Flight Deck Solutions (FDS) in Canada was commissioned to supply the MIP.

Note that in this review, reference is made to the term OEM which is an acronym for Original Equipment Manufacturer (aka real Boeing 737 aviation part).

The image above is the Duel Seat Training Device offered by Flight Deck Solutions (image courtesy and copyright FDS).

Information - Not Pretty Pictures

This post is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the FDS MIP or the parts attached to the MIP.  Rather, the intent of the review is to provide adequate information for enthusiasts to make an intelligent decision to which MIP to purchase.  

Furthermore, it is important to understand that all reproduction simulator parts are exactly that - a reproduction or facsimile of a real part.  Often reproduction parts are not to scale and have subtle differences to the real item.  Whether this is important is at your discretion and very much depends upon whether you intend to use OEM parts or solely reproduction parts.

To view images of the MIP, navigate to the image gallery. 

Interface cards have not been discussed for two reasons.  First, there are several differing types of cards that can be used, and second, Integrated Cockpit Systems (ICS) units come ready-made with all wiring and interface cards installed. 

ICS and Options

FDS provide two options when purchasing their MIP - naked (do it yourself) or as an integrated cockpit system (ICS).

The ICS route was chosen because of time constraints; by eliminated the task of wiring and soldering a multitude of interrelated electronic parts together, it would allow more time to concentrate on converting real aircraft parts to use in the simulator.  At the forefront of the B737 project, the MIP was to be a skeleton from which to hang OEM parts.

The MIP consists of two sections; the main instrument display including the lower display and glare shields (eyebrows), and the base structure incorporating the CDU mounting area, lower display and stand.

FDS landing gear lever is a good facsimile of the real lever; however, the lever does not recess between the two half moons.  Nor is the red trigger spring-loaded as in the OEM mechanism.  Despite these aesthetic shortfalls, the landing gear functions well.  The leather skirt is a step in the right direction concerning authenticity

UPPER MIP (Instrument Panel, Glareshield and Lower Panel/Kick Stand)

The panel is made from CNC machined acrylic and the glare shield from injection molded plastic. The panel and glare shields have been attached by screws to a light-weight powder coated aluminum frame which incorporates a 4 inch wide shelf on the rear side. 

The cut-out lettering, which allows the lettering to be back-lit, is very crisp with well defined edges.

The panel has been professionally painted in Boeing grey.  Although the panel is made from acrylic, the use of high quality flat paint removes the sheen that acrylic is renowned for.  In comparison to other plastic-looking panels on the market, the colour and appearance is very true to form.  It looks 'almost; like the OEM panel. and matches the real aircraft parts very well.  Furthermore, FDS apply the paint in several thin layers which makes the coating very resistant to chipping and scratching.

Switches have been mounted in the correct locations and the wiring from these switches has been secured within a wiring lumen or by plastic cable ties.  The switches and knobs replicate those of the real aircraft and have the correct feel, although the general purpose knobs (GPK) do not replicate the exact appearance of the OEM knob.  Where a panel has not been included (not stock B737 configurations) a blanking panel has been fitted.

The soldering work and connections on all switches are excellent; it is more than obvious that the person who did the soldering work is a professional with many years experience.

The gear lever is sturdy and feels solid.  To engage the landing gear, the lever must be pulled out of its recess and pushed up or down.  The detail to the lever is excellent and installation includes the correct-looking fiber sleeve.  The mechanism does not have the spring-loaded trigger; the trigger is a solid cast item attached to the lever.

Annunciator lights (six packs) and various warning lights are all functional; however, pale comparison to OEM parts and other high-end reproductions; they appear 'cheesy'.  The glare shield is strong textured ABS plastic and wraps over the top of the MIP.  A correctly sized chart pocket is screwed to the top of the shield.  The two glares either side of the MIP on the Captain and First Officer side are painted MDF wood and although not have a negative appearance they do not replicate the appearance of the OEM glare which is made from textured foam plastic.

The shelf system, located behind the main instrument panel, is an excellent idea.  The shelf, in addition to providing an area for the FDS monitor stands to be mounted, is a good platform to mount various cards, speakers and other items that may be required.

The FDS bracket, a novel design to hold the display units firmly in place.  The display unit bezel is made from plastic and does not hinge outwards as the real bezel does.  the knobs on the ISFD are not replicated

The lower display modules, which are mounted to the lower area of main panel, are installed using normal Phillips-head screws.  In a real B737, panels and modules are usually secured using DZUS  fasteners or skirted screws.  It would have been a nice touch to have replicated the use of DZUS fasteners on the panels in the lower kick stand.

Display Unit Covers

The protective displays that the computer monitor screens (display units) are made from 1.5 mm thick perspex.  I have found the perspex to be very reflective - especially so if the simulator is located in a well-illuminated room.    

Integrated Back-Lighting (IBL)

Integrated back Lighting (IBL) is the name FDS has coined to refer to their proprietary design in which FDS utilise aircraft bulbs rather than LEDs.  IBL is supplied to illuminate the back lighting in all FDS panels and modules.  

One of the main advantages of a bulb in contrast to that of a LED is the throw of the light and the colour temperature.  The area of coverage from bulbs is relatively even, where the coverage by an LED is more pinpoint and uneven.   The only way to achieve a similar light coverage to bulbs using LEDs is to use several LEDS mounted in close proximity to each other. 

One area that the use of bulbs  excels is the rear illumination of the stencil-cut lettering on the MIP.  Bulbs will completely illuminate the stencil cut-outs where LED lighting will often only illuminate part of the stencil cut-out (unless there are several LEDs).

Bulbs and LEDs have different colour temperatures.  A bulb transmits a warm colour (soft orange hue) whereby a LED transmits a cooler colour that appears more blue in comparison.

All Boeing airframes, with the exception of the newest airframes utilise 5 and 28 volt incandescent bulbs.

The only downside of IBL (if there is one) is that the bulbs generate quite a bit of heat.  The life of a bulb is also less than a LED.

Ground Proximity Panel showing use of Phillips head screws rather than the more usual DZUS fasteners

What the MIP Lacks

The non-use of DZUS fasteners in the lower panel (kick stand) and the failure to use skirted screws has been mentioned.

Stand-by instruments and clocks are not included.  FSD supply a stenciled backing card which is mounted behind the perspex to mimic the look of the yaw dampener, brake pressure, clock and flaps gauge. 

Considering the purchase price of a MIP, and considering the importance of a working flaps gauge, an operational analogue flaps gauge should be a stock item.  

The avionics suite (Sim Avionics) can display virtual stand-by instruments id required.

The speed reference panel and knobs are not functional. The knobs used in the speed reference panel do not replicate the OEM knobs used in the B737; the real aircraft uses double rotary encoder knobs. As with the flaps gauge, these knobs should be functional and, at least shoe some resemblance to the real part.

Software - Interface IT

The software to interface the MIP (InterfaceIT) seems to be well designed and robust.  It does require a learning curve to become proficent with the software, but once proficent the siftware is logical in layout and use.  Installation of the IT software is straightforward.

Additionally, there is a direct link between InterfaceIT and Sim Avionics which makes internal configuration and programming very easy.

Flight Avionics Suite

Duel Seat Training Devices (DSTD) and MIPS configured by Flight Deck Solutions use Sim Avionics as their flight avionics suite.  After you receive your MIP, FDS staff will e-mail to you a file which you import into InterfaceIT.  This file holds the data assignments for the MIP buttons and switches.

Although FDS recommend Sim Avionics, there is no obligation to use this software; the MIP will operate with whatever software you choose.  A seperate post will deal with a review of Sim Avionics.

The rear shelf located behind the MIP and the propriety bracket used to hold the display units (computer screens) firmly in place.  The bracket works exceptionally well and the shelf is very sturdy

Lower Base Structure

The base structure comprises the lower section of the MIP and includes the CDU bay structure and lower display screen.  The structure is made from aluminum which has been professionally powder coated in Boeing grey. 

As with the upper section of the MIP, the attention to detail is obvious.  There are no sharp edges on the CDU bay structure, nor are there gaps where panels attach together.  Screws match their holes correctly.

The DZUS rails that line the internal section of the CDU bay marry perfectly with the DZUS fasteners used to secure the Control Display Unit (CDU/FMC) to the rails.    It does not matter whether a reproduction or OEM CDU unit is used as both will fit perfectly.

The lower display screen, which fits between the two gaps in which the CDUs reside, is identical in shape and manufacture to the upper display unit bezels.  Unlike the three upper bezels in which a standard computer monitor can be mounted, the lower screen requires a smaller monitor which is not an off the shelf item.

clock panel showing backlighting during the day. the fabrication of this panel and button is very good as is the stenciling

Dimensions, 1:1 ratio and Using OEM Parts

The ability of a manufacturer to produce a MIP that is the correct 1:1 ratio to the real item cannot be underestimated.  If an enthusiast is intending to only use instruments and panels produced by that manufacturer, then any size disparity is probably unnoticeable and probably not that important.  However, if OEM parts are to replace reproduction parts, then the base sizing become crucial to the correct and easy fitment of an OEM part.  In this area, the FDS MIP has some shortfalls.

The MIP has a number of holes and gaps that parts reside, for example for the AFDS and flaps gauge.  If the holes are incorrectly matched to the OEM part, either a new panel (aluminum backing plate) will need to be engineered and painted, or the hole may need to be enlarged.  Although enlarging a hole in a MIP is straightforward, the opposite is problematic and requires the design of a new panel.

Unfortunately, many of the holes in the FDS MIP do not correspond to the correct size when fitting OEM parts.  For example, the holes that the AFDS units reside must to be enlarged considerably to enable OEM AFDS units to be fitted.  Likewise, the holes to fit the annunciators need to be enlarged.  The hole that the flaps gauge is housed is far too large and a new panel needs to be designed to gt an OEM flaps gauge.

Detail of the angled shelf used to accommodate the I/O cards.  The multi-voltage computer power supply can also be seen mounted behind the perforated vents.  The terminal block caters to 5 and 12 volts.  The interface card is the FDS SYS card which comes standard with the ICS MIP

Power, System I/O Cards and Cabling

A multi-voltage computer power pack is used to power the MIP and has been mounted at the rear of the lower base structure. 

The position chosen is well suited to internal wiring and allows easy access should a problem develop.

An angled shelf has been engineered to fit immediately behind the CDU bay.  The design of the shelf is intended as an area on which to mount the various interface cards required to operate the simulator.

The interface cards required to operate the MIP have been secured to the angled shelf and all wiring has been expertly soldered or attached via solid electrical clips.  Cabling and connections are of the highest quality.  Each of the wires that are connected to the SYS board has been tagged with a plastic tag which indicates their function; a good idea if you need to change something at a later date or troubleshoot a particular problem.

There has been no compromises with regard to how the staff at FDS wired the MIP - it is beyond reproach.

3mm replacement side stand.  The replacement stand inhibits any movement of the MIP as the structure is not (at the moment) installed within a shell

Base structure (side stands)

The base structure (stand) has been designed to be mounted either directly to a base platform.  The mounting points are numerous holes along the lower angled edge of the stand.  A concern was that the structure would wobble, as it is quite high and made from light-weight aluminum. 

These concerns were short-lived; once each attachment point was secured with a screw the assembly was quite solid.  This said, if you energetically engage the landing gear lever, there is a very slight movement in the upper area of the MIP.  If you are mounting the MIP into a cockpit surround, any movement will cease as it will be attached to the outer skin of the shell.

To counteract any movement, it is a relatively easy matter to fabricate two replacement side stands from a thicker sheet of aluminum (3-5mm).  This will guarantee that there will be no movement when manipulating knobs, the landing gear, etc.

Navigate to this post to read about the replacement side walls.

Communication, Support and Delivery

Communication with FDS was excellent.  E-mails were always answered in a timely manner and Peter and Steven Cos are very professional in their approach. I was continually kept in the loop regarding construction and shipping.

Support if and when required is either via a dedicated forum, e-mail, or if necessary by telephone.  Peter and Steve Cos very approachable and helpful and their support is second to none.  I would go so far as to say that the support that FDS provides cannot be matched.

It is important to note that Flight Deck Solutions is not a mail order company with products in storage waiting to be shipped; products are assembled to order.  This means that often there is a timely wait until you receive your shipment.

The MIP I had delivered to Australia was packed in and attached (screwed) to the floor of a large wooden crate.  It arrived undamaged.

Quick List - Pros and Cons

PROS

  • Well designed & constructed

  • Excellent workmanship (metalwork and wiring)

  • Realistic and highly effective Integrated Back-Lighting (IBL)

  • Good functionality

  • Very clean appearance - wiring and cards favorably positioned

  • 1:1 (or as near possible) to the real MIP (exception if using OEM gauges)

  • Moderate to high attention to detail

  • Robust & functional software (InterfaceIT) if using Sim Avionics avionics suite

  • Excellent paint quality (several layers of paint) that resists chipping and scratching

  • Outstanding support - the best in the industry

CONS

  • No analogue flaps gauge, other than virtual version (rectified by spending more money)

  • No stand-by instruments or clock (rectified by spending more money)

  • Non use of DZUS fasteners in lower panels above 'kick stand' (small things do make a difference)

  • RMI knobs are very low quality

  • Speed reference knobs are very low quality & do not replicate OEM B737 knobs

  • Landing gear lever does not recess behind shield when in down position

  • Landing gear does not utilise the spring trigger as in the real aircraft

  • Section between upper and lower MIP (kick-stand) is not the correct shape.  It should be rounded and not be an angled piece of aluminum

  • Display unit covers are very reflective (easily rectified- remove or replace them with tinted displays)

  • Slightly inaccurate General Purpose Knobs (GPK) - poor stenciling on knobs

  • The MIP is not completely 1:1 and if using OEM parts, some engineering is required to fit OEM parts

  • The MIP is not an exact reproduction and artistic license has been taken in some areas (for example, the section between the upper and lower MIP (kick-stand).  The MIP also lacks various screws and fasteners seen on the OEM MIP

Important Point:

  • If you are intending to add OEM panels, switches and knobs to the FDS MIP, be aware that many of the panels do not fit the FDS MIP.  This is because the MIP frame is not exactly 1:1 with the OEM equivalent.  In some instances (such as when retrofitting panels) the MIP is out by up to 1 cm.  Also be aware that OEM korrys, flaps gauges and some of other avionics will not fit into the precut holes.  You will need to either enlarge the hole or make it smaller.

FDS GPK with backlighting. The knob has a slightly different shape to OEM knobs. the adjustable propriety backlighting is perfect

General Purpose Knobs (GPK)

The GPKs are of high quality, however fail in a number of areas.

The black line is a manually applied adhesive which depending upon which knob you are inspecting, may or may not be quite straight.  Being adhesive, with time the transfer lifts, especially at the ends.  The translucent line between the black outer lines is not as bright as that observed in the real aircraft.  Not all knobs have the transfers correctly aligned.

poor quality lower kickstand knobs. gpk showing excess plastic from manufacture process

The knobs are the incorrect shape and the grub screws are located in the wrong position on the knob.  The knob also does not have an inside metal shroud (circular retainer).  The retainer increases the longevity of the knob as it stops the acrylic from being worn down over time with continual use.

The knobs on the lower kick stand are also of poor quality bearing only a little resemblance to the OEM knobs

The knobs serve a function, but for the price of the MIP, knobs that reflect a more accurate representation would have been appreciated.

fds adf knob. WHY EVEN HAVE THIS AS IT IS NOTHING LIKE THE OEM RMI KNOB

RMI Selector Knobs

The knobs are made from acrylic with a transfer attached.  The knob has no functionality and is attached to the MIP in a recessed hole.  The RMI knob bears no resemblance to the OEM knob and is very poor quality.

Speed reference knobs are very low quality

Speed Reference Knobs (SRK)

The speed reference knobs supplied with the FDS MIP bear no resemblance to the OEM knobs. The OEM knob should be a double rotary encoder knob.  There has been no attempt to replicate this type of knob.

Used Fuel Reset Switch

FDS have used a normal two-way toggle which is incorrect.  There is no similarity to the OEM used fuel reset switch.  The OEM toggle has a large bulbous head and is a specially-designed three-way toggle.

fds Boeing warning system. although functional the displays fall short of replicating the oem items

Autopilot Flight Director System (AFDS) 

Although not an exact replica of the OEM part, FDS has done a good job replicating the functionality of the AFDS.  Unfortunately, if you wish to replace the FDS unit with an OEM AFDS unit, the hole in the backing plate that attaches to the MIP will need to be enlarged considerably to allow correct fitting of the OEM component.

Boeing Warning System (six packs)

Compared to the OEM counterpart, FDS’s offering is lacking. The two warning buttons can be depressed very easily where the OEM buttons are quite firm requiring a good push. The six packs work quite well, however, lack adequate light coverage when a warning is displayed.

Annunciators (korry condition lights)

The FDS MIP uses LED reproduction annunciators (korrys).  The LEDS are illuminated by two 5 volt LED lights which do not provide complete light coverage across the lens plate.  The brightness of the LEDS is also not as bright as the OEM annunciators. 

Furthermore, the hole in the MIP that the korrys reside is a tad on the small side; therefore, if you are intending to replace the reproduction korrys with Original Equipment Manufacture (OEM) annunciators, you will need to engineer the hole to a larger size.  This is unfortunate as a MIP should be manufactured 1:1 to allow reproduction parts to be replaced with OEM parts.

on the oem landing gear the red trigger sits flush with the two half moons

Landing Gear Lever

The landing gear lever requires more explanation.

In the real B737-800 NG the landing gear handle sits closer toward the main instrument panel.  The half circular shield is designed so that the red-coloured gear trigger sits between the two half moon shields when the lever is in the DOWN position.  In the FDS version, the trigger sits too far out from the front of the MIP and the trigger is not protected by the two shields.

Furthermore, the trigger is not spring-loaded as in the OEM mechanism; it is a solid piece of metal.

Lights Test / DIM Switch

A normal two-way momentary toggle is used which is incorrect.  The OEM switch is a three way non-momentary switch which allows the switch to be placed in any one of three positions.  The OEM toggle is also large than a standard toggle switch.

Final Call

The MIP is well made and has been finished with obvious care; parts line up correctly, screw heads have not been burred and paint not chipped.  Wiring, soldering, parts, switches, paint, colour, rotaries, blanking panels and display frames are of the highest quality.  It is obvious you are dealing with a premium product that provides an very good facsimile of a 737-800 instrument panel.

Downside is the lack of any hard-wired gauges, poor quality speed reference and general purpose knobs, lack of DZUS in lower panels, no flaps gauge, and a wrongly positioned landing gear lever (when in the down position).  Another issue is that the MIP is not 1:1 with its OEM counterpart, nor is it a 100% accurate rendition of an OEM MIP. 

This said, for many enthusiasts this will not be an issue as the differences are minor.  If you intend to use OEM parts then some parts of the MIP will need to be fabricated to enable the real parts to fit snugly into the MIP.

Depending upon your end use - a MIP with reproduction gauges, or a MIP skeleton to hang OEM parts - your views will alter.  Certainly, the FDS MIP is not to be discounted as a premium product; it is a pity that FDS did not take a few extra steps to make this MIP the 'Queen of the crop.

The closest rival to the FDS MIP is the MIP manufactured by Fly Engravity and SimWorld.  Other MIPS are available from other companies, but the FDS MIP, although lacking in some areas is superior in many ways. 

Rating is 7.5/10

Please note that this review is my opinion only..  Furthermore, note the date of the review.   Flight Deck Solutions may have updated their MIP after this review has been published. 

  • Thanks to Peter Cos, Flight Deck Solutions for allowing the use of the front image.

NOTE:  Before taking what you read as gospel, check the FDS website in case these shortcomings have been rectified since this post was published.

737 Fuel Management Program

/

fuel planner user interface

Flight planning is a large part of flying the 737, in real life and virtually.

Yes you can fly with the three fuel tanks full, however, bear in mind that you will not be simulating a real flight.  Airlines rarely fly an aircraft between two locations with a full fuel load, unless it’s required for operational use or safety. 

Fuel is heavy, and the additional weight requires more power and fuel to move between locations.  This equates to an increased expense.  Airlines usually only carry enough fuel to reach their destination, taxi, and one or two alternate airports.

You can calculate the appropriate load sheets, distances between airports, winds, altitudes to be flown, and alternate airports. But this can be time consuming, and often you don’t want to simulate the paper trail that goes hand in hand with getting a 737 into the air. For those keen on paperwork and simulating everything, I recommend the program TOPCAT - Take-Off and Landing Performance Calculation Tool.

Ross Carlson has created a very handy and functional fuel management tool to use.  The program is stand-alone and does not need to be installed into the flight simulator directory or to C://drive/Programs; the software can be installed to and run from any folder including your desktop.   Initially designed to work with the Boeing 737NG developed by Precision Manuals Development Group, the utility works well for other 737 aircraft, provided they have the same operating limitations and fuel tank capacities that the software was designed.

The only issue to be wary of is that the aircraft you are flying matches the same weights as those used by PMDG.

  • Supports 737-600, 737-700, 737-800 and 737-900.

  • Values can be entered and displayed in pounds or kilograms.

  • Reads payload (passenger and baggage) weights via FSUIPC.

  • Calculates en route fuel burn based on cruise altitude and trip distance.

  • Calculates fuel burn to reach alternate airport.

  • Calculates increased or reduced fuel consumption due to forecast winds en route.

  • Allowances for taxi-out fuel burn, holding fuel burn, and minimum landing fuel.

  • Indicates if any parameters exceed aircraft operating limitations.

  • Sets actual fuel levels in your aircraft via FSUIPC.

  • One simple .exe file, no external DLL or data files required.

  • Loads first 1,000 pounds of fuel into the center tank to keep pumps submerged.

  • Accredited for use with registered non-registered copies of FSUIPC.

Operation

I've been using this fuel planner or quite sometime and it works quite well.  I open a flight and then run the fuel planner and change the variables as required.  Then, after I've boarded the fuel I exit the fuel planner program.

The only let down with the program, and this probably is an advanced feature not deemed necessary when the program was developed, is that it doesn't provide %CG which is used in a CDU to determine your takeoff trim.

Search google for PMDG fuel planner and you will find several sites that allow you to download the program.  Alternatively, download the software from the file download tab.

CDU by Flight Deck Solutions - Review

/

Pro Mx CDU by Flight Deck Solutions

The Control Display Unit (CDU) is the pilot interface to the Flight Management Computer (FMC).  The FMC integrates with the Flight Management System (FMS) of the aircraft.  The FMS contains the navigational database.

Historical Context 

The first true FMC was introduced in 1984 with the release of the Boeing 737-300.  In its most basic description, the FMC can be described as a computer that can store flight and navigation data and perform detailed and comprehensive assessments of the stored data, providing the pilot with up date information that is relative to safe and accurate flight.

Flight Management Computer (FMC) & Control Display Unit (CDU)

The CDU interface enables the flight crew to interact with the FMC and FMS to access, amougst other things: the navigational database, autopilot, flight director, auto-throttle and internal reference system (IRS).

An aircraft will only have one CDU installed, however, dependent upon company regulations, air safety and routing (flying over water), many operators will have two CDU units installed for redundancy and independent use by the Captain and First Officer.  Think of the CDU as a keyboard to the FMC which in turn is a component of the FMS.

This said, the acronyms CDU and FMC are often used interchangeable in aviation parlance.

Flight Management System (FMS)

The FMS is an integrated system of which the FMC and CDU is just one component.  The FMS is capable of four dimensional area navigation (latitude, longitude, altitude & time) while optimizing performance to achieve the most economical flight possible.  

The FMS stores the navigation database and route information which the autopilot will fly when in LNAV mode. When given data such as YMHB & KSEA, it takes inputs from the fuel summation unit to give a gross weight and best speeds for take off, climb, cruise, descent, holding, approach, etc. These speeds can all be flown directly by the autopilot & auto-throttle in VNAV mode.

Flight Deck Solution's PRO Mx CDU

The CDU manufactured by Flight Deck Solutions (FDS) is an outstanding piece of simulation engineering.  The unit is well built, solid, and replicates a real B737 style CDU 1:1.

The CDU body and bezel (front plate) is manufactured from high grade metal while the rear section that houses the electronics is plastic.  A USB and VGA cable connects to the video card output on the computer. The connections to the cable are located on the rear of the unit allowing easy connectivity to the computer.  The CDU has been painted in the correct Boeing grey colour and the paint has been applied professionally in several thin layers; the paint does not chip or wear off with use.  Importantly, for those using genuine aviation parts, the unit is DZUS complaint and drops into the rails in the CDU bay with perfect precision.  FDS includes four DZUS fasteners to allow connection to the rails.

High Fidelity Dimable Keyboard

The keyboard used in the CDU is made from high definition injection-molded plastic and the keys are dimpled and back-lit.  The keys are very tactile and when depressed an audible click is heard ensuring you know the key has been depressed.  

For night operations, the unit has a knob that can be rotated to dim the back-lighting brightness level of the keys.  A functional metal carry bracket, that folds out from the edge of the bezel is also included.  This replicates the carry handle on the real CDU.

Functionality - Software (Sim Avionics & ProSim737)

It is important to understand that the functionality of the CDU is not generated by software that comes bundled with the unit, but by the avionics suite you have chosen to use.  Therefore, I have chosen not to discuss the various options that each software suite may or may not replicate.  In the real world, airline companies have the opportunity to purchase specific options they believe are relevant to their flight operations.  This said, many of the variations have been replicated in both software suites.

I have used the CDU with Sim Avionics and ProSim737; both software suites provide excellent functionality and work flawlessly with the unit.

The CDU is used throughout a flight; therefore, reliability is expected.  The solid construction of the FDS CDU has not let me down and after endless pressing on keys they still function as you would expect them to. 

The CDU at night showing only illumination from the unit.  The backlighting is adjustable and able to be dimmed by turning the dim knob on the unit

Navigation Database

The unit does not ship with navigation data included.  The navigational database which includes STARS and SIDS, Runways, airports must be purchased separately from Navigraph and then installed into your avionics software suite.  Download and installation of the database is very easy and most of the installation is automated.

WOW Factor

The best feature of the CDU I have left to last – the display.  'WOW' is the only word to describe the display.

The display is a colour VGA display unit sporting 800 x 600 resolution.  What this means is that the script on the display is VERY clean, VERY readable and VERY sharp.  Being a colour display means that differing colours (white, green and magenta) can be used for the fonts that your avionics software generates.  The use of colour helps distinguish between functions that are activated or in stand-by mode, not to mention enhancing the units display readability.

The display is equally distinguishable in full daylight and in darkness and does not exhibit screen cut off when viewed at an angle (as some laptop screens are prone).

Configuring the CDU

Configuring the CDU using Sim Avionics was relatively painless.  You must designate which CDU you are installing (Captain, First Officer or Instructor), edit a few lines in the .ini file to ensure it recognises the correct CDU, and configure the display location.  The only teething issue I had was ensuring that the monitor display window size was correctly positioned on the screen for the location of the CDU.  It took quite a few attempts to get the position 'just right'.

The set-up with ProSim737 is equally straightforward, however, to ensure correct operation you must install and enable additional software supplied by ProSim737.  Installing and initiating the software is relatively straightforward, however, it's important to follow the provided instructions to ensure trouble free operation.

Manual and Tuition

A manual explaining the functions of the CDU and/or tutorial is not included.  In my opinion, FDS should develop a video tutorial that runs you through the basic functions of the unit including a simulated flight.  This said, there are several dozen excellent tutorials that can be found on U-Tube that provide basic and advanced CDU use. 

When you purchase the CDU a basic manual explaining the installation and set-up procedure is included..

The FMC Guide written and sold by Bill Bulfer is strongly recommended as this guide provides basic and advanced tuition in how to use the CDU.  A review of the FMC Guide can be read here.

I cannot fault the CDU unit manufactured by Flight Deck Solutions and believe it to arguably be the best piece of reproduction hardware currently available.

My Rating 10/10

Please note that this review is not endorsed by Flight Deck Solutions (FDS) or by any other reseller.

 
 

A short video depicting some of the more commonly used keystrokes of the Flight Deck Solutions CDU.  No particular key sequence has been followed. The video is to demonstrate the screen resolution and the uptake speed after depressing a key.  Double click video to view full screen.  Note that this video was produced using Sim Avionics software suite.  ProSim737 software provides slightly different options.

Update

on 2016-01-10 23:27 by FLAPS 2 APPROACH

The CDU was purchased in February 2012 and has seen solid use to January 2016 in both Sim Avionics and ProSim-AR avionics suites.  During this time, the unit has worked perfectly. 

For any reproduction item to operate over a four year period without any problems, can only support my view that Flight Deck Solutions (FDS) produces high quality hardware that has not been designed to fail after a short period of time.

Update - B737 Project - Flight Deck Snapshot - February 1, 2012

/

flight simulator in 2012. A lot more to do before it is completed

I thought I'd post an image of the flight deck to date (February 1, 2012).  It's still a a little messy, but most of the major things have been completed.

MIP, InterfaceIT & CDU

The MIP is now finished and installed on the custom-made platform.  InterfaceIT software is installed and tested.  Apart from some minor switching assignment issues there were no problems and all MIP functionality is operational.  The CDU has been fitted and operates well; the only minor problem I had with the installation was getting the window positioned appropriately.  I'll be doing a review of the CDU at a later date.

The MCP and EFIS unit has not been installed.  The unit I did have from CP Flight proved problematic  and has been returned to CPF in Italy for evaluation and possible repair.  I'm confident that the new unit will have minimal installation problems.

B737 Throttle Quadrant & Center Pedestal (Avionics Bay)

The throttle quadrant has been fitted and is functional, while the avionics bay requires some modules to be fitted to bring it up to specification. Namely: two ADF modules, a rudder trim module and maybe a cargo door module.  I have yet to decide which vendor will supply these modules.

The audio modules currently in the bay are real modules that still require conversion to FS.  I haven't decided whether I'll do a conversion or just purchase a reproduction audio panel and save the conversion challenge for a later date. 

I also must install the microphone and telephone to the rear of the bay. I managed to find a genuine telephone and microphone that came from a scrapped 737-500, but its taken some time to find  the correct cradle to attach the phone and mike to the end of the bay.

ACE Yoke, Externals & Replacement Yokes, Columns & Rudder Pedals

The ACE yoke is fitted and functional without a chart holder; I am still waiting for Ali to send the chart holder he forgot to include with the shipment.  By the time the holder arrives, I'll have installed real B737 yokes and chart holders....

I haven't spent much time investigated what external visuals will be used. In the interim I'm using two computer displays; one to show the forward outside view and the other the instructor station for Sim Avionics.  Nothing fancy but its functional for the time being.

In April, I will be removing the ACE yoke and installing two genuine B737 yokes and columns along with duel linked rudder pedals.  Rudder guards, panels and a forward steering wheel will be added shortly after.

What Am I Doing Now

I'm testing, fine-tuning and and "bug hunting".  I'm also learning new skills.....and enjoying some time actually flying (even with the small external screen)  In contrast to my previous simulator, there is much to learn & discover.  Quite a bit of time is spent with my head in manuals figuring out the various relationships between on-board systems, CDU and how they represent their data on the PFD and ND. 

If you want to learn how to do things correctly, you will spend more time reading than actually flying - at least at the beginning of the project.  You get out of the simulator what you put in...

What's Next - The Future

For those that have not read  Blog in entirety, an overhead will be added at a later stage and possibly a shell.  This will coincide with the movement of the simulator from the upstairs spare room to a dedicated room to be built in the basement section of the house.

Tasks set for the near future, other than testing & bug-hunting are:

  • Populate the avionics bay with the required avionics modules

  • Install MCP and twin EFIS units to the glare panel

  • Install & configure dual real B737 yokes, columns & rudder pedals

  • Either add a 2nd CDU or use a dummy panel to the First Officer side of the MIP

  • Install a flaps gauge with servo to the MIP for real flap gauge movement (not MIP virtual movement)

  • Install a real B737 telephone & microphone to rear of the avionics bay (waiting on phone cradle)

  • Convert fire suppression module to semi-full functionality using Phidgets (only partially done at the moment)

  • Install & evaluate add on software (REX2 - textures only & ORBX scenery & airports)

  • Investigate external views - possibly a LCD television as an interim to overhead projectors

There is always something to do   :)   Thanks for stopping by.

Live ATC - Listen to ATC In Real Time

/

Many virtual aviators are confused when it comes to understanding the language used by air traffic control and pilots.  The three questions often asked are:

  • What to say ?

  • When to say it ?

  • How to say it ?

There are several on-line tutorials available to learn air traffic control and aviation language, however, often a far easier and more interesting method is to actually hear ATC talking to pilots and vice versa.  This in conjunction with a little reading can get you up and flying quickly without making mistakes  when flying on-line.

To listen to live ATC, go to Live ATC, select your airport code and frequency and sit back a listen.  The frequencies are already on the website, so all you need is the ICAO or IATA code of your airport. 

Live ATC can be be listened to either via the web or if your "on the move" and really cannot be without ATC, then your android or i-phone. ATC is a volunteer organization, so expect some adverts on their website.

Flight Testing - The Good, The Bad & The Ugly

/

lot 737-600 (RHL Images from England, LOT B737, SP-LKF (3833448252), CC BY-SA 2.0)

Flight Testing - Hardware & Flight Models

Now comes the fun and not so fun part - field testing.  Everything has been configured (throttle, MIP, yoke, etc) and requires flight testing to ensure correct operation.  Reliability is related to repeatability; therefore, to ensure reliability you must replicate the outcome several times before you can state something is working correctly.  This takes time and many takeoffs and landings.

As you can imagine, there are many systems that inter-finger to achieve the desired outcome, and all the systems, hardware, software and components must be correctly communicating between themselves to replicate flight.  Often a small problem can develop from something as insignificant as a loose wire or a incompatible computer part.  I've already had a few spanners thrown into the mix with faulty power packs, problematic USB cables and USB ports and a few user problems.

It's during this test period that I hope to iron out any niggle problems to ensure a robust and trouble-free system for the future.

  • Flight testing occurs whenever a new component is added, changed, or the avionics software is updated.

Word of Advice - Go Slow & Be Methodical

To determine the solution to any problem that may arise, it's important to know which hardware or software is causing the problem.  When in the test phase, it's best to only have the basic software installed.  When your happy with the result, add another piece of software and test.  This is the best way to build a robust system.  The temptation is to install everything and then field test, only to find an issue and not be able to work out what is causing the problem.  Develop and build in stages, try to take your time, be methodical, take notes and replicate the results before moving on.  It's a slow and often tedious process.

One benefit of going slow is that you will have the opportunity to learn your software and know what it can do and more importantly what it can't do. 

Bugs

Often individuals will state a piece of software has bugs as it doesn't do what they believe it should be doing.  Certainly some software is bug prone and should be avoided, however, for the most part high-end software and hardware more than often operates correctly and is trouble free. 

A piece of software or hardware can only function within the specifications of the, motherboard and other software you have installed.  It is not uncommon for one individual to state a bug whilst another has no issues what-so-ever.  Before crying BUG, it's best to check, double check and then check again.  Often the fault will be your computer set-up or your lack of knowledge to what the software can or cannot do with regard to the computer and computer components you are using.

Examining The Flight Models

Testing also includes evaluating the two flight models that interest me: the PMDG FS9 and default FSX 737.  At the moment I prefer the former; probably because this is the aircraft model I've used since it was release.  Each model has its differences and nuances.

I'll post a separate entry in the Journal outlining my thoughts on the two models in due course, although this is a personal preference.

Unfortunately, the CP Flight MCP PRO I purchased appears to be faulty and have been returned to Italy.  Using the virtual Sim Avionics MCP achieves the same outcome, but it's a bit ungainly using a mouse and separate MCP screen.  Hopefully a replacement MCP will arrive in a few weeks time which will flying easier and more enjoyable.

Testing Duration

To test anything properly requires at least a few weeks; as mentioned above repeatability must occur.

Eye Candy

The outside model, what the Americans call eye candy is not of great importance to me.  Most of the time I like to fly IFR in inclement weather, so looking out the front or at the exterior is not that important; I spend most of my time reading instruments, manuals and looking at charts (yes I like paper charts although I do also have an electronic flight bag).

External Visuals

At the moment, during the initial flight testing stage I am using a rather small computer display; functional when building and testing, but not that exciting to fly with.  Following construction, more suitable external visuals will be looked at.

Update

on 2013-06-17 23:00 by FLAPS 2 APPROACH

Time has been limited, however, I have completed several flights using the two flight models that interested me - the default B737 FSX and the PMDG (FS9 version) B737.  Although both flight models depict the same aircraft, there is considerable variation in how each model behaves. Many of the differences are small and probably would not be noticed by a casual flier who has only experienced one flight model.

Easy to Nit Pick

It's easy to fall into the trap comparing flight models for entirety and nit-pick each to death without coming to a conclusion.  Put simply, it's about compromise.  Each model has its benefits and failings.  After considerable time and effort, I've decided that the PMDG FS9 model is suitable to my style of flying (at the present time).

Main Differences - PMDG FS9 Model & Default FSX 737 Model Using ProSim737

The main differences that I have noted is that the default B737 model, in many respects, is VERY EASY to fly.  Its responsive to flight inputs and generally speaking is not challenging when flying - even in a cross wing.  Some of the methods in which instrumentation interact with the model is also slightly different. For instance, when flying in command mode (auto pilot on), the default B737 will not allow you any roll CWS using the yoke.  You must depress the CWS button on the MCP to allow the aircraft to be rolled whilst the auto pilot is controlling the aircraft.

In contrast, the PMDG FS9 flight model is generally more difficult to fly and control.  Landing in a cross wing requires far more concentration as does a normal take off and climb to altitude.  Interestingly, the CWS issue mentioned above is not a problem with the PMDG model.  If the aircraft is in autopilot mode with command activated and you wish to alter course, all you need do id move the yoke and CWS roll or pitch is activated whilst the auto pilot is maintained.  This has obvious benefits.

A few other variables that I was not happy with when using the default model are;

  • Instability in pitch during a VNAV descent

  • Instability in pitch when using the speed brake

  • Overpowering of engines during take off and climb

  • Flaps extension and retraction appears to be very fast

  • CWS roll/pitch requires engagement of CWS button & disengagement of auto pilot

  • Poor outside visuals (aircraft in spot mode)

Many of the above issues can be easily rectified by editing the constraints in the Air File.

One of the benefits of the default model is it allows connection and configuration to any of the standard FSX controls (aircraft lighting, various buttons, etc).  It's unfortunate that the same level of interaction is not possible when using the PMDG model (without further configuration & work around).  As an example, the navigation and strobe lights cannot easily be connected to an outside switch using PMDG.  This is because PMDG has configured their model outside the standard defaults of FSX.

I have no doubt that there are other nuisances that I've yet to discover. 

Which Flight Model - PMDG FS9...

Personally I prefer the PMDG FS9 model as it delivers greater flight accuracy than the default model.  For this reason I will most likely use the PMDG as a standard model.  This said, once some tweaks are made to the default model's Air File to counter the above mentioned dot points, the model flies quite well with full button capability.  However the CWS roll & pitch discrepancy, for me, places the PMDG FS9 model ahead of the default model.

Update

on 2012-06-20 03:30 by FLAPS 2 APPROACH

After spending the last few months on and off flight testing, I thought I'd share my final decision to which flight model the simulator will be using. 

ProSim 737 and JetStream B738

I spent May and June field tested ProSim 737 as an alternative to Sim Avionics.  ProSim737 can be used with a number of add on aircraft, however, they also produce a dedicated flight model to the their own software called the JetStream Advanced Flight Model B738.

I'm impressed  with the JetStream and believe it to be the par of the PMDG FS9 model.  Certainly, the external visuals do not match PMDG, but this is not the concept behind the JetStream.  The concept ProSim wanted to deliver was an aircraft model that provided a top shelf flight model compatible with ProSim's flight avionics suite.  As such, external visuals are as per the default FSX 737.

I'll be compiling and posting to the journal section  an evaluation of the JetStream shortly.

  • The avionics suite chosen is ProSim737 and the flight model is the JetStream 738 (as at June 2012).

Never Do This - Changing Voltage Will Destroy Your Computer

/

Friedrich Haag, 003 2018 05 14 Dunkelheit, CC BY-SA 4.0

I am using two computers networked.  I was doing some tests in an attempt to separate the sound between the two computers so I can utilize a headset when I heard a horrible grating noise coming from one of the computers.  I've heard the sound before so knew what it was; one of the fans was either failing or required lubricant in the bearing.  A little odd considering both computer are less than 3 months old.

Variable Fan Switch

The computer has a variable fan switch on the rear toward the power cord.  I lent down behind the MIP to either turn the switch to low or off in the hope of isolating the fan noise.  As I selected the switch I heard "BLIP" and the computer stopped.  I closed the other computer down, found a torch (flashlight) and peered behind the computer console.  I saw the switch, but to my horror I also saw another switch.  Sliding the computer out from behind the MIP I authenticated what I had thought.  Instead of switching the variable fan switch I has tripped the switch that changes the computer from 240 volt to 110 volt.  Both switches reside almost side by side.

Voltage

Never change a voltage switch on the rear of the a computer from your countries voltage requirement.  Depending upon which direction you move the switch and what voltage you are current on, will indicate the resultant effect.  240 V - 110 V "blip"!  110 V to 240 V "BANG" with everything "fried" beyond repair.

In some respects I was lucky, I only "fried" my power source.  A replacement was relatively easy  and I had a IT friend check the computer to ensure there were no other issues.  Oh - and the noisy fan was isolated and replaced.  It was the fan on one of the video cards (there are three video cards.  The video card was replaced under warranty.

Advice For The Future

Use a piece of tape to cover the switch so it cannot be inadvertently tripped.

Landing Lights, But No Overhead - Go Flight Module

/

The 737 Project has been reasonably well mapped out and the work schedule revolves around specific aircraft systems. I try to finish work on one system (for example, the automation on the throttle) before moving to the next.

One of the provisos when I started this project was that I wanted the simulator to be working during construction. I was afraid that without using the simulator the project would loose traction.

The overhead is not scheduled for sometime (it is one of the last systems to completion).  In the interim, I am using the Sim Avionics virtual overhead, and moving a mouse around a screen is hardly realistic.

There are a number of switches on the forward overhead panel that can be easily mapped and configured to a toggle switch, and the switch mounted somewhere within the simulator.  Although unrealistic it is a better option than the mouse.

I have several GoFlight modules from my earlier simulator that were gathering dust; therefore, I decided to use two Go Flight T8 button modules to act as a interim overhead. I use the module to turn on and off the various lights - such as landing, taxi, navigation, collision and beacon.  The toggles also operate the anti-ice, CDU mode, seat belts, no smoking lights, yaw dampener and re-circulation fans.

The modules have been mounted into the center pedestal.  Although rather crude and certainly not realistic it works and fills the gap until the overhead is completed; making it easier to access the landing and a few other switches that are are used on every flight.

Belkin Hubs - An essential Add On

/

 

BELKIN powered hub with external case removed

Throttle Commands Not Working

Refurbishing a throttle quadrant is not without its problems.  In an earlier post, I touched briefly on the issue of the throttle commands not responding.  The connection between flight simulator and the throttle would drop out and anything related to the throttle quadrant would cease to function.

Determining the problem was time consuming, however, the culprit was a faulty power supply that powered a Belkin USB powered hub.  The power supply I had been using was a standard computer power supply unit (PSU) and it was not new.  The PSU was overheating, and when it reached a particular temperature it would cause the powered Belkin hub to disconnect.  When the PSU returned to normal temperature (after being turned off) the Belkin hub worked perfectly.

USB Hubs - always use a powered hub

Hubs are an important piece of gear when putting together a simulator or running anything that has a lot of peripherals.  Unless you have a city of USB ports on the rear of your computer (unlikely) then you will need a hub.  Hubs are good as they minimize the number of USB cables that need to be connected to your computer.

When selecting a hub only use a powered hub. The reason being is that there is often a lot of information being transmitted, via the hub, between your device and the computer.  A powered hub helps maintain the integrity of the hub and stops information drop outs.  I only use non-powered hubs for devices such as keyboards and mouse.

Phidgets and Hubs

I learned from experience (computer crash & scrambled phidgets) that it is not a good idea to connect phidgets directly to your computer via the USB cable.  I'm not exactly sure why this is not possible, but it is recommended on the Phidget forum to always use one or two powered hubs when connecting phidgets to your computer.

Outstanding Service - You Tell Me....

/

Christmas and New Year is the worst time for anything technical and complicated to arrive - period.  Stores close, technicians take vacation, and managers and owners hide from the public.  For many, Christmas is a religious and/or festive day.  For most, it's a time to escape the pressures of work and relax with friends and family.

Software Installation & Configuration Questions

It was a few days before Christmas Day, the MIP had arrived a few days earlier. For some reason I couldn't get the FDS software to function correctly, I didn't have a registration key to unlock the software, and basically was a little clueless on how to get this animal moving! 

Several e-mails had transpired between Flight Deck Solutions and Sim Avionics - but it was slow going.  I was keen to get the basics set up so I could navigate through the various configuration options during the Christmas week.

Then, on Christmas eve - 2130 Canadian time my cell phone rang....  "Hi this is Peter Cos from Flight Deck Solutions, I hear you have a problem!  I can sort this out for you quickly.  I realize there are many systems to get in place and your feeling overwhelmed at the moment - no problems.  Let's work through each issue in turn and get you flying"  

From this post, you may think that the configuration of FDS and Sim Avionics software is difficult; this is far from the truth.  Once you are steered in the right direction, have the correct folder structure established on your computer, installation is very straightforward. 

Now, for those who are really bored and have read through this website in entirety, you may remember that one of the reasons I bought from Flight Deck Solutions was because of the backup service.  Tell me - what better service can you expect when the owner of the company rings you, from the sidewalk outside a restaurant in Canada, to try and solve your issue......ON CHRISTMAS EVE!

Following this phone call, I received prompt e-mails from Mark Hastings (United Kingdom) and Nat (Australia).

Thank you Peter Cos, Steven Cos, Mark Hastings and Nat for your time and patience.

  • All the issues were solved over the next few days via e-mail and telephone calls.